A shortened noun ends in a fixed alif (al-fatā), a defective noun in a fixed yāʾ after kasra (al-qāḍī), and an extended noun in hamza after an added alif (al-samāʾ). All three case vowels are implied on the shortened noun; ḍamma and kasra are implied on the defective noun while fatḥa appears; all three appear on the extended noun.
Three kinds of noun end in a way that interferes with case marking. A shortened noun ends in a fixed alif, a defective noun in a fixed yāʾ after a kasra, and an extended noun in a hamza after an added alif. The first cannot show any case, the second can show only one, and the third shows all three normally. This lesson explains why, and what happens to each in the dual and the plural.
A shortened noun ends in a fixed alif. A defective noun ends in a fixed yāʾ with kasra before it. An extended noun ends in a hamza preceded by an added alif.
By the end of this lesson
The word "fixed", lāzima, matters in each definition. The letter must belong to the word, not be an accident of inflection. The alif of the dual in muʿallimāni is not fixed, so that word is not shortened.
All three vowels are estimated on the shortened noun. Ḍamma and kasra are estimated on the defective noun while fatḥa appears. All three appear normally on the extended noun.
The reason differs between the first two, and the wording of each reason is fixed in the books. On the alif, the vowels are impossible, li-l-taʿadhdhur. On the yāʾ, ḍamma and kasra are heavy, li-l-thiql, while fatḥa is light enough to be pronounced.
جَاءَ الْفَتَىٰ وَرَأَيْتُ الْفَتَىٰ
jāʾa l-fatā wa-raʾaytu l-fatā
The young man came, and I saw the young man.
جاء فعل ماضٍ مبني على الفتح، الفتى فاعل مرفوع وعلامة رفعه الضمة المقدرة على الألف منع من ظهورها التعذر، رأيتُ فعل وفاعل، الفتى مفعول به منصوب وعلامة نصبه الفتحة المقدرة على الألف منع من ظهورها التعذر.
The same written word in two different cases. Nothing on the page distinguishes them; only the analysis does. This is exactly why iʿrāb is a spoken discipline as much as a written one.
جَاءَ الْقَاضِي وَرَأَيْتُ الْقَاضِيَ
jāʾa l-qāḍī wa-raʾaytu l-qāḍiya
The judge came, and I saw the judge.
جاء فعل ماضٍ مبني على الفتح، القاضي فاعل مرفوع وعلامة رفعه الضمة المقدرة على الياء منع من ظهورها الثقل، رأيتُ فعل وفاعل، القاضيَ مفعول به منصوب وعلامة نصبه الفتحة الظاهرة على الياء.
Here the two cases do look different, because fatḥa is light enough to sit on a yāʾ. Note the wording changes accordingly: 'estimated, prevented by heaviness' for the nominative, 'visible' for the accusative.
An indefinite defective noun loses its yāʾ in the nominative and the genitive, with tanwīn standing in its place. The yāʾ returns in the accusative and is kept throughout when al- is attached.
جَاءَ قَاضٍ عَادِلٌ
jāʾa qāḍin ʿādilun
A just judge came.
جاء فعل ماضٍ مبني على الفتح، قاضٍ فاعل مرفوع وعلامة رفعه الضمة المقدرة على الياء المحذوفة، عادلٌ نعت مرفوع وعلامة رفعه الضمة الظاهرة.
The yāʾ is not written and not pronounced, and the marker is estimated on a letter that is not there. Compare raʾaytu qāḍiyan, where the accusative brings it back. Keeping the yāʾ here, writing qāḍī with tanwīn, is the commonest error in this chapter.
Check yourself
Give the case and the full marker.
سَلَّمْتُ عَلَىٰ قَاضٍ
Genitive, with an estimated kasra on the deleted yāʾ.
ʿalā requires the genitive. The noun is indefinite and defective, so the yāʾ is dropped in the genitive as it is in the nominative, and the marker is estimated on the letter that has been removed. Only the accusative would restore it.
Each type changes its ending by a regular rule when made dual or plural.
Three errors, all of them about writing what should not be written or estimating what should be visible.
The definitions, the reasons for estimation and the rules for dual formation are given in these texts.
A rule is clearest in a text you already know by heart. Each ayah below contains the very construction this lesson teaches, and every one has a full word-by-word i'rab on this site. Read the ayah first and try to find the construction yourself, then open its i'rab to check.
Common questions
For two different reasons. On a final alif all three vowels are impossible to pronounce, li-l-taʿadhdhur, so all three are estimated. On a final yāʾ, ḍamma and kasra are heavy, li-l-thiql, so those two are estimated while fatḥa, being light, appears normally.
When the noun is indefinite and in the nominative or the genitive. qāḍin, "a judge", is written and pronounced without its yāʾ in both, with tanwīn compensating. In the accusative the yāʾ returns: raʾaytu qāḍiyan. With al- the yāʾ is kept throughout: al-qāḍī.
Its alif returns to its origin if the word has three letters: fatan becomes fatayāni because its alif is from yāʾ, and ʿaṣā becomes ʿaṣawāni because its alif is from wāw. If the word has more than three letters the alif is turned into yāʾ: mustashfā becomes mustashfayāni.
It depends on the hamza. If the hamza is original it stays: qurrāʾ becomes qurrāʾāni. If it stands for the feminine alif it turns into wāw: ṣaḥrāʾ becomes ṣaḥrāwāni. If it is converted from an original letter both are permitted: samāʾ gives samāʾāni or samāwāni.
Only when its hamza is the alif of femininity. ṣaḥrāʾ and ḥamrāʾ are diptotes for that reason. An extended noun whose hamza is original, such as qurrāʾ, is fully declined and takes tanwīn normally.
al-fatā is a noun, declinable, and its case is estimated on the alif. ʿalā is a particle, built, and has no case at all. A particle never has iʿrāb, so the question of an estimated marker does not arise for it.